Without GRSecurity+PaX Linux is LESS secure than windows 7!

Discuss usability issues, general maintenance, and general support issues for a grsecurity-enabled system.

Without GRSecurity+PaX Linux is LESS secure than windows 7!

Postby mikeeusa2 » Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:20 pm

Without GRSecurity+PaX Linux is LESS secure than windows 7!
Indeed!

(Win 7 has noexecutestack support etc)

Why have the linux kernel team rejected grsec+pax? Are they fools?
Is it better that way so that grsec and pax can do their own thing?

What __~~~~________IS__________~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_____ your opinion!?
http://www.linuxtoday.com/infrastructur ... 0435SCMSHU
mikeeusa2
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:54 am

Re: Without GRSecurity+PaX Linux is LESS secure than windows 7!

Postby spender » Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:48 am

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Windows is more secure because of the PaX Team's work.

-Brad
spender
 
Posts: 2185
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2002 8:00 pm


Return to grsecurity support

cron