Since pages have vanished, worse! have been substituted with non-related and misleading pages on Debian fori (forums for non congnizants of Latin), pls. brothers, take note that this page is there now (to my understanding, and I'm Tor-browsing):
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=105549&p=504825#p504825
and that the links in there are consistent, not only not dead.
I have now checked all the links in that page, all are there and all are consistent.
I have not been able to refrain from some scathing language, but I believe it was still certainly within limits of decency.
I'll be back but not to write anymore, just to check if there's anybody's reply to my topic to answer to, here as well as on Debian forum, and then I'm away for a while.
Grsec kernel 3.9.8 installed and working on both of my Debians!
God bless all the readers!
compilation error with grsecurity patch to Debian kernel
19 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: compilation error with grsecurity patch to Debian kernel
by timbgo » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:22 am
- timbgo
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:34 am
Re: compilation error with grsecurity patch to Debian kernel
by timbgo » Tue Aug 06, 2013 9:59 pm
Somewhat further above in this thread, there is this post:
https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3585#p13169
Since I am, by now, used to seeing my small occasional contributions damaged in the way of outside links,...
[[ feel free to check around this post:
https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3585#p13190
for that matter but come back here ]]
...I summarily skimmed through what I wrote the last time (that's how slow I work on things: it's been almost one month since!)...
...And I found that what I corrected, I believe with a reason, has been rolled back completely.
I am talking about the correction, as explained in the first link in this topic (the one that ypu should look up to understand which exact one correction I made), I am talking about the correction that I made to the
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Grsecurity/Configuring_and_Installing_grsecurity
You can currently see the difference here:
https://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=Grsecurity%2FConfiguring_and_Installing_grsecurity&diff=2545657&oldid=2541578
What is cited is that I didn't use the right encoding.
That at this time, I can not prove with obvious technical certainty, but it could be either a deliberate lie or a hidden edit at a later time than was my edit (my edit being left correctly cited at the time of the the post already pointed for you above), again: either a deliberate lie, or a hidden edit abusively attributed to me, but performed later than my real edit.
And it was possibly done or induced or asked for by the vitrioloids that I talked about in some of my posts, or by scum search engine's paid associates, or some other such people. See if the all and any spy agencies friendly engine tells you where it is in my posts... Search for mention of vitriol, vitrioloid(s), vitriolism(s)... and see who I refer to...
If anybody saw my correction, in the time, now here is the point, in the time span between:
The above is a past from that comparison page.
in any time btwn 2013-07-04 and 2013-07-27 ...
in any of that time...
you should have seen something like...
What anybody in the span of those nineteen days would have seen, something like...
...No! Not just alike, but exactly this:
https://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=Grsecurity/Configuring_and_Installing_grsecurity&oldid=2541578
Pls. somebody confirm how miserable the page according to my alleged edit that I can't see how I could have done it like that, is!
No, I couldn't have done that!
I use Emacs, the default is UTF-8, in LXTerminal 0.1.11 that I use in Debian the default is UTF-8, in the Hv3 (that I was compelled to use because Tor is not the match for Wikibooks/Wikipedia etc. as it is small or none added problem here, and sure, Tor browser is UTF-8...
And Gentoo is really even more UTF-8 perfect than Debian (I also use Gentoo on some systems)...
This topic has been seen by hundreds, and I am now compelled to go and find if I documented what I did, and try to show to you...
No I didn't document that change on my computer, I didn't expect such intrigue there!
But you do need to know, I'll cite vaguely Tom Hartmann that has a show on Russia Today (probably can find his shows on rt.com but I didn't see it there, I saw it via satellite), when he hosted Gabriel Weinberg of DuckDuckGo.com the sole competitor to the scum engine of the day, in his show Conversations with Great Minds or a title to that effect. It aired a few days ago.
[[ https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Gabriel+Weinberg ]]
Tom Hartmann said in that show that he saw huge rooms, of people, probably neocons (to that effect he described them), all working on wikipedia and such pages...
They were editing different Wiki pages apparently to suit big business and their interests.
That what he says that he saw I didn't see, but I did see the actions of that to me very certain reality!
It is so true!
Believe you me, and I'll be glad if anybody confirms, anybody who visited those pages in that period of time... what I describe above.
Just one thing.
Possibly their unregistered, possibly hacked-into change and named in my name (so pls. mind that I am not claiming that Meev0 did it, I just don't know), was introduced some time before Meev0 editor editied that (hacked) change...
The problem is there's a lot of people who will sell you for a drink and a few dimes by Google or any other big business...
What about the Google Summer of Code or some such?
C'mon, giving Pinocchios small change and buying the bright ones (but only technically so, as soon as they go with the Foxes of Google such as those that befriended Carlo Collodi's Pinocchio, their mind is not in the clear!)...
But not all Pinocchios remain with the heart good to be brought back to happiness in the heart.
Some turn into corporate vultures, and believe you me, there is no happiness where lies and might and money gained on abuses to others grow!
Some of this summers' Pinocchios will also turn into corporate vultures, sadly.
And they took the fine GNU Cinelerra program to Google this summer
[[ http://cinelerra.org/soc.php ]]
... God!... No!
Namely, Cinelerra is where I have just spent weeks on end, on my slow systems...
Have a look:
https://lists.skolelinux.org/pipermail/cinelerra/2013-August/019292.html
but possibly come back for more from me here on Grsecurity forum. I've compiled myself
$ uname -r
3.10.4-grsec-130806
$
and I'll test and report the latest grsecurity as well, as per:
https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2847
which taken from:
https://grsecurity.net/~spender/
seems to be the grsecurity patch for:
linux-3.10.5
Cheers!
Miroslav Rovis
[[ I documented this posting, as well as what the links open:
4640783ad30ddee39b003cd3deecf6a698e6b60b8590c0290e505c9342d9584d
d202eeb9a25ec3eed8442cf2a85e666b084b18d3d9013e9649b6c979840a4308 ]]
P.S. Being truthful, I can see that after longer time online (but I have poor user's defence to revert to the clean state before the attack... -- the attack being usually through programs the kind of those that Edward Snowden revealed, or those that Zero-exploit sellers know so well about-- ...I can see that my emacs has lost a little the UTF-encoding.as it's default. I believe it is recently induced change and happened really really recently, to my firm rememberance.
But I assure you that Hv3 which I used to do the one exact, now reverted change, reverted for the worse, and in which I did that change, I don't think could have been hacked into so promptly and I remember the good old Grsecurity Wiki page with my change didn't look as it is reported to have looked (see the links) at the time of this edit of it. Not in Hv3, not in my Tor browser.
I lost a lot of time on this, and I have to spend more, those treacherous people paid by big business having done the damage... But I will have to go back and correct that very misleading error, which we now see what it is there for. To gard against people easily installing Grsecuriy. To mislead them. And they did it deliberatelly.
https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3585#p13169
Since I am, by now, used to seeing my small occasional contributions damaged in the way of outside links,...
[[ feel free to check around this post:
https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3585#p13190
for that matter but come back here ]]
...I summarily skimmed through what I wrote the last time (that's how slow I work on things: it's been almost one month since!)...
...And I found that what I corrected, I believe with a reason, has been rolled back completely.
I am talking about the correction, as explained in the first link in this topic (the one that ypu should look up to understand which exact one correction I made), I am talking about the correction that I made to the
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Grsecurity/Configuring_and_Installing_grsecurity
You can currently see the difference here:
https://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=Grsecurity%2FConfiguring_and_Installing_grsecurity&diff=2545657&oldid=2541578
What is cited is that I didn't use the right encoding.
That at this time, I can not prove with obvious technical certainty, but it could be either a deliberate lie or a hidden edit at a later time than was my edit (my edit being left correctly cited at the time of the the post already pointed for you above), again: either a deliberate lie, or a hidden edit abusively attributed to me, but performed later than my real edit.
And it was possibly done or induced or asked for by the vitrioloids that I talked about in some of my posts, or by scum search engine's paid associates, or some other such people. See if the all and any spy agencies friendly engine tells you where it is in my posts... Search for mention of vitriol, vitrioloid(s), vitriolism(s)... and see who I refer to...
If anybody saw my correction, in the time, now here is the point, in the time span between:
Revision as of 19:23, 4 July 2013 (edit)
MiroR2 (discuss | contribs)
m
← Older edit
Revision as of 05:42, 27 July 2013 (edit) (undo)
Meev0 (discuss | contribs)
The above is a past from that comparison page.
in any time btwn 2013-07-04 and 2013-07-27 ...
in any of that time...
you should have seen something like...
What anybody in the span of those nineteen days would have seen, something like...
...No! Not just alike, but exactly this:
https://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=Grsecurity/Configuring_and_Installing_grsecurity&oldid=2541578
Pls. somebody confirm how miserable the page according to my alleged edit that I can't see how I could have done it like that, is!
No, I couldn't have done that!
I use Emacs, the default is UTF-8, in LXTerminal 0.1.11 that I use in Debian the default is UTF-8, in the Hv3 (that I was compelled to use because Tor is not the match for Wikibooks/Wikipedia etc. as it is small or none added problem here, and sure, Tor browser is UTF-8...
And Gentoo is really even more UTF-8 perfect than Debian (I also use Gentoo on some systems)...
This topic has been seen by hundreds, and I am now compelled to go and find if I documented what I did, and try to show to you...
No I didn't document that change on my computer, I didn't expect such intrigue there!
But you do need to know, I'll cite vaguely Tom Hartmann that has a show on Russia Today (probably can find his shows on rt.com but I didn't see it there, I saw it via satellite), when he hosted Gabriel Weinberg of DuckDuckGo.com the sole competitor to the scum engine of the day, in his show Conversations with Great Minds or a title to that effect. It aired a few days ago.
[[ https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Gabriel+Weinberg ]]
Tom Hartmann said in that show that he saw huge rooms, of people, probably neocons (to that effect he described them), all working on wikipedia and such pages...
They were editing different Wiki pages apparently to suit big business and their interests.
That what he says that he saw I didn't see, but I did see the actions of that to me very certain reality!
It is so true!
Believe you me, and I'll be glad if anybody confirms, anybody who visited those pages in that period of time... what I describe above.
Just one thing.
Possibly their unregistered, possibly hacked-into change and named in my name (so pls. mind that I am not claiming that Meev0 did it, I just don't know), was introduced some time before Meev0 editor editied that (hacked) change...
The problem is there's a lot of people who will sell you for a drink and a few dimes by Google or any other big business...
What about the Google Summer of Code or some such?
C'mon, giving Pinocchios small change and buying the bright ones (but only technically so, as soon as they go with the Foxes of Google such as those that befriended Carlo Collodi's Pinocchio, their mind is not in the clear!)...
But not all Pinocchios remain with the heart good to be brought back to happiness in the heart.
Some turn into corporate vultures, and believe you me, there is no happiness where lies and might and money gained on abuses to others grow!
Some of this summers' Pinocchios will also turn into corporate vultures, sadly.
And they took the fine GNU Cinelerra program to Google this summer
[[ http://cinelerra.org/soc.php ]]
... God!... No!
Namely, Cinelerra is where I have just spent weeks on end, on my slow systems...
Have a look:
https://lists.skolelinux.org/pipermail/cinelerra/2013-August/019292.html
but possibly come back for more from me here on Grsecurity forum. I've compiled myself
$ uname -r
3.10.4-grsec-130806
$
and I'll test and report the latest grsecurity as well, as per:
https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2847
which taken from:
https://grsecurity.net/~spender/
seems to be the grsecurity patch for:
linux-3.10.5
Cheers!
Miroslav Rovis
[[ I documented this posting, as well as what the links open:
4640783ad30ddee39b003cd3deecf6a698e6b60b8590c0290e505c9342d9584d
d202eeb9a25ec3eed8442cf2a85e666b084b18d3d9013e9649b6c979840a4308 ]]
P.S. Being truthful, I can see that after longer time online (but I have poor user's defence to revert to the clean state before the attack... -- the attack being usually through programs the kind of those that Edward Snowden revealed, or those that Zero-exploit sellers know so well about-- ...I can see that my emacs has lost a little the UTF-encoding.as it's default. I believe it is recently induced change and happened really really recently, to my firm rememberance.
But I assure you that Hv3 which I used to do the one exact, now reverted change, reverted for the worse, and in which I did that change, I don't think could have been hacked into so promptly and I remember the good old Grsecurity Wiki page with my change didn't look as it is reported to have looked (see the links) at the time of this edit of it. Not in Hv3, not in my Tor browser.
I lost a lot of time on this, and I have to spend more, those treacherous people paid by big business having done the damage... But I will have to go back and correct that very misleading error, which we now see what it is there for. To gard against people easily installing Grsecuriy. To mislead them. And they did it deliberatelly.
- timbgo
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:34 am
Re: compilation error with grsecurity patch to Debian kernel
by timbgo » Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:24 pm
I just a few minutes ago rolled the one change back to what I described here:
https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3585#p13169
(where I entered discussion in this topic),
and which I explained what happened with last night.
This time around they could only say that I did anything wrong if they managed to disappear files that identify to these SHA256 sums from my computer:
7e76c9982157a039acbbdf797b95ff8771e0ced777ad834f069f26bf544b157c
cf461f2b54aac4374a02c1ad641ea79fbcd85d9e555995d57c6a2da1dc3a78de
I believe this topic is now closed with this.
https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3585#p13169
(where I entered discussion in this topic),
and which I explained what happened with last night.
This time around they could only say that I did anything wrong if they managed to disappear files that identify to these SHA256 sums from my computer:
7e76c9982157a039acbbdf797b95ff8771e0ced777ad834f069f26bf544b157c
cf461f2b54aac4374a02c1ad641ea79fbcd85d9e555995d57c6a2da1dc3a78de
I believe this topic is now closed with this.
- timbgo
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:34 am
Re: compilation error with grsecurity patch to Debian kernel
by timbgo » Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:58 am
Oh, I forgot that further above I said I would tty and keep up with the testing grsecurity/pax patches.
I did install just fine, as fast as 3500MHz AMD Athlon based system can do it ...
... and have
$ uname -r
3.10.5-grsec-130807
$
in my systems (because I cloned it onto another box with 3800MHz Athlon, and use only clean system when I go online. That's my poor user's defense).
I would like to do more.
To improve the tips&tricks post that I started writing some time ago:
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=103425
Grsecurity patched vanilla kernel (the missing part)
(that's by the title)
Because that tip is so insufficiently organized, and dispersed.
but I am not even familiar enough with gradm, and many other things. So I'll need and teach myself first and go through the Grsecurity/Pax documentation once more, first.
And it's way more effort and time than I am able to dare to afford.
Be back when I can...
I did install just fine, as fast as 3500MHz AMD Athlon based system can do it ...
... and have$ uname -r
3.10.5-grsec-130807
$
in my systems (because I cloned it onto another box with 3800MHz Athlon, and use only clean system when I go online. That's my poor user's defense).
I would like to do more.
To improve the tips&tricks post that I started writing some time ago:
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=103425
Grsecurity patched vanilla kernel (the missing part)
(that's by the title)
Because that tip is so insufficiently organized, and dispersed.
but I am not even familiar enough with gradm, and many other things. So I'll need and teach myself first and go through the Grsecurity/Pax documentation once more, first.
And it's way more effort and time than I am able to dare to afford.
Be back when I can...
- timbgo
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:34 am
19 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2