Usefulness of grsec ACL system for chroots

Hi,
Is the ACL system any usefull for daemons that are ALL chainrooted?
That is, all the the publicaly accessible daemons are chrooted (apache, apache-ssl, postfix, and nsd [name server] ). The ACL system requires that root is essentially crippled which is no good for cron jobs (logrotate, etc..)
ALL of the chroot restrictions are on and daemons running non-root. Is there really any advantage running the ACL system?
- Adam
PS. Local users are 100% trusted
Is the ACL system any usefull for daemons that are ALL chainrooted?
That is, all the the publicaly accessible daemons are chrooted (apache, apache-ssl, postfix, and nsd [name server] ). The ACL system requires that root is essentially crippled which is no good for cron jobs (logrotate, etc..)
ALL of the chroot restrictions are on and daemons running non-root. Is there really any advantage running the ACL system?
- Adam
PS. Local users are 100% trusted
